Some time ago, I was surprised to see the following question in a predicted GCSE paper:

Solve for x:

2x3x+234x+1

Give your answers to two decimal places (3 marks)

Why surprised?

Surprised because the techniques you need to solve it correctly are Further Maths A-level, rather than GCSE. A similar - if anything, less involved - question cropped up in an FP2 paper in 2013 for seven marks.

It’s not too tough to find where the two expressions are equal - in my opinion, that would be a fair top-end GCSE question.

If you multiply both sides by 3x+2 and 4x+1, you get 2x(4x+1)=3(3x+2).

Expand and simply, and that’s 8x27x3=0.

That doesn’t factorise, but can be solved with the formula: x=7±14516, and the calcu…

OW!

14512+124, so you’re looking at a shade more than 19161.19 and a shade less than 5160.32.”

“Thank you, sensei.”

“Don’t let it happen again.”


So that’s all well and good for the equation, but what about the inequality? Naively – and what I expect the setters of the paper expected to see – you might say “does the inequality hold between the solutions or outside?” When x=0, it holds, so you’d give the answer 0.32x1.19.

Unfortunately, it’s the wrong answer

This answer doesn’t account for the fact that the expressions are both discontinuous.

When x is a smidge smaller than 23, the left-hand expression is an enormous positive number (and greater than the right-hand expression, so the inequality doesn’t hold). A smidge larger, and it’s a huge negative, and the inequality does.

Similarly, the right-hand expression changes sign at x=14.

Instead of two places where the truth-value of the inquality changes, we have four: x=23 (from false to true); x0.32 (true to false); x=14 (false to true); and x1.19 (true to false).

So, you might write down the answer 23x0.32 or 14x1.19.

But that’s also wrong

At x=23, the inequality has no truth value, because the left-hand expression is undefined. The same is true for x=14.

So the correct answer to the question as stated is 23<x0.32 or 14<x1.19.

I predict confidently that nothing along those lines will appear on a GCSE any time soon, even at the top end.