A Textbook Error?
In class, a student asked to work through a question:
Let
. (a) Show that
can be written as . (b)Hence find
, stating its domain.
The answer they gave was outrageous 1.
Part (a)
Part (a) was fine: combine it all into a single fraction as
First part of (b)
… and the inverse function isn’t much more difficult: starting from
Second part of (b)
This is where the mark scheme and I disagree.
According to the mark scheme, the domain of the inverse function is
And my problem goes back to part (a): the function is not properly defined: no domain is given. We can assume, reasonably, that it’s as big as the definition allows: all real numbers are allowed, except for -1 and 4.
Yes, and 4. Even though the ‘equivalent’ form,
And that has a knock-on effect for the inverse: because
So, according to me, the correct answer to the second part of (b) is
Any objections? No. Good.
Footnotes:
1. Am I doing this clickbait thing right?