Ask Uncle Colin: Too Many Answers
Dear Uncle Colin,
I have to solve
for – I get four answers, but apparently only two are correct. Any suggestions? Blooming Impeded: Rudimentary Knowledge And Reasoning
Hi, BIRKAR, and thanks for your message!
This looks tasty! Let’s work through it.
Your approach was to set
If you wanted to use the
(You got here by a circuitous route)
It’s absolutely fine to wallop this with the formula, but I’m going to take a different approach: let
That doesn’t factorise, but the square completes easily:
So
This gives (as you got) four answers for
However, two of these don’t work: it’s always important to check that your answers satisfy the original equation. It turns out that 119º and 331º are spurious solutions.
Where did they come from?
When you squared the equation, you turned negatives positive – and that’s introduced places where
How else could you do it?
I think the most reliable approach here is the harmonic transformation:
Now,
This means
A bit of trigonometry gives
So:
When we un-sine this, we get a principal solution of about 16º. We expect a second solution as well: if
Adding the 45º back gives 61º and 209º, the two correct solutions.
Hope that helps!
- Uncle Colin
- Edited to correct LateX, 2021-12-08.