At the East Dorset MathsJam Christmas party, @jussumchick (Jo Sibley in real life) posed the following question:
There are two ways to draw a 16-gon with rotational symmetry of order 8 inside a unit circle, as shown. What’s the ratio of their areas?
Typically, I look at this sort of question and sigh: it’s going to need a (shudder) calculator to work out the lengths of the various sides, and the areas will be really ugly numbers… but I was assured the answer was ‘something nice’. So, I put down my mince pie and picked up a pen. (For the sake of narrative, I’ve covered up some of my mistakes.)
The splitting up of the shape
My first step was to notice that I could split each of the shapes into 16 congruent triangles – from the centre of the circle (O) to a point on the circle (A), to one of the ‘elbows’ (B) between the circle points. In the 16-gon made of two squares, the angle OAB is , as it’s half of a right-angle. The angle BOA is , because it’s a sixteenth of a circle, and the final angle ABO is . In the other 16-gon, angle BOA is , like before; ABO is easy to find, too – if you continue OB through B, the other side of the angle is – so ABO has to be . OAB turns out to be as well. In each case, the side opposite the largest angle is 1 – the radius of the circle.
Every Core 2 student knows what to do from here: work out another side using the sine rule, then use to find the areas, multiply them by 16 and get the ratio. Full marks, next question. And a gaping void in your soul, of course, but you don’t lose marks for that. What a mathematician does is, find a formula for the area of the triangle that works directly from the information we have: a side and three angles. It’s not too tricky: the sine rule says , so or, if we’re tidy-minded, , which has a nice symmetry to it. (Incidentally: I had this formula wrong to begin with; my and were transposed. It smelt funny: there’s no real difference between angles B and C, so it didn’t make sense for them to be divided rather than multiplied).
Now you work out the areas, right?
Nope. Don’t care about the areas. I care about their ratios. If I set up the triangles so that my is 1 in both cases, I want the ratio: How lovely! We can simplify it immediately by dividing both sides by to get: Multiply everything through by and to get: – and the left-hand-side works out to be . The right-hand-side… well, I’d understand reaching for a calculator… but you really don’t need to! It turns out that , which means you can rewrite the right hand side as , so our ration is: , or, more neatly, . What do you know? It was a nice number after all!