The Legendary Question 6
I say it’s legendary – I hadn’t heard of it before stumbling across this Numberphile video:
That said, it’s a question with a good story behind it: it’s from the 1988 International Mathematics Olympiad (which immediately says “this is a hard question”); it was marked with two asterisks to say “this is especially hard”.
So hard, in fact, that Terry Tao – who would go on to earn a Fields Medal and general renown as an incredible mathematician and role model – “only” scored one point out of a possible seven. (He still got a gold medal. It was around the time of his 13th birthday. “Only.” Pah.)
Anyway, here’s the question:
Let
and be positive integers such that divides . Show that
is the square of an integer.
If you’d like to have a go at it, please do! Obviously, don’t get disheartened if you struggle. It’s a two-asterisk IMO question. After the break, I’ll take you through my solution (which relied on a big hint from the video). And in case you missed the implication, there are spoilers below the line.
My solution
Here’s how far I got on my own.
I know that
I think it looks nicer if it’s all on one side:
And I’m trying to show that
I tried many things here, not limited to falling down a rabbit hole of discriminants. However, the hint of “look for other solutions” was the key one.
That is, what I’ve got here is a quadratic in either
So here, given
Put another way, if you know
For example, if you spot that
That sequence comes from the recurrence relation
You solve the characteristic equation,
There’s a clever bit here, too.
Thinking about the binomial expansion of each of the pieces, the even terms will be nice integers, but the odd terms will contain some multiple of the square root. So, any integer solutions for
- Make the square root vanish - in the positive integers,
is a square only for . - Cancel the square root with an astute selection of constants – if
, the square roots will simply disappear.
Case (1) can be shown not to work: going back to
In case (2), it’s clear that
And there you have it!
Analysis
I’m not sure how convincingly I’ve shown that this is the only way to account for the square roots – it might be better to say that
The
I’m curious to hear about different solutions! As always, if you’ve got something to add, drop me an email.
Footnotes:
1. splosh